The superstructure did not fall from the sky (placement on issues raised by the confrontation for the marriage of homosexual couples and criticism of the KKE positions)

Excerpt - pre -publish from the proletarian flag

"There is no idea in the world that does not have the signs of class struggle"

Mao Chetog

THE Establishment of political marriage for homosexual couples was an obligation of Government against the EU in order to complete its agenda in the name of eliminating discrimination.

This famous agenda tries to settle Problems of the bourgeoisie itself or to regulate to its advantage Social groups problems, as their bourgeois people rank some of their special features, to avoid reference to social classes. In the name of always eliminating discrimination, they have 'solved' the Issues of gender inequality. So they were able to, in the name of the equality, to abolish a series of conquests of the female and labor movement, such as early women retirement and legitimize the dismissal of pregnant women.

First of all, It is wrong to characterize any view in general and vaguely as conservative or progressive. Must always be determined in relation to what compared. Thus the renewal that the bourgeois brings to the form of the family with the homosexual wedding, does not destroy it but instead reinforces it and It adapts to the new data, it refreshes it. David Cameron, from their Conservative leaders in Britain, he once said: "I do not support homosexual marriage even though I am conservative. Him I support because I'm a conservative. " The English Torks call themselves 'Conservatives' because they want to keep customs and customs, principles, tradition and Institutions and above all the family.

For the Great class every country still marriage is an economic transaction not done with private contracts (exceptions always exist) nor with pre -empty, but with the mediation of hereditary family civil law. The same laws regulate the possessions of petty bourgeois, only who are dropped by complex and expensive. The same laws apply to Labor family that does not solve it but cause her many problems, since it is considered a privileged a worker who has a home and a car. Into This legal framework is demanding that the bourgeois bourgeois pairs be included and to They do not risk their wealth from sideways. By institutionalization Marriage for same -sex couples do not only benefit the bourgeoisie. The bourgeois class When he legislates, he does so in the name of all the citizens of the state. With This is how other classes benefit. But the equilibrium in Capitalism at the same time conceals and perpetuates class inequality.

The L Esbians, the THE Pentecostal, the A bisexuals, the T Rans, the K Wir, the I desexual or Anshexy (LOATKI), Overall all people who feel they don't belong to heterosexuals or cannot be identified with one of the two sexes, in the overwhelming majority oppressed and live in silence or in margin of life. This does not mean that one can deny legal their equality. After all, only this can offer them this miserable system of inequality and exploitation that produces fascism, Racism and cannibalism of religious darkness. The adventurism is found To those who claim that only she is enough.

The system does not care about anyone. The case of the jacket of Jacques that crawl for years in the courts, as is done in cases where they are heading All the time for concealment, he teaches a lot. But above all, how the system shows The same indifference to the life of LGBTKI and the life of the whole people.

THE Government has passed the controversial bill on their marriage homosexual couples in spite of the lamps he had inward, which he equalized with the influx of votes from the major and minor opposition. There are real disagreements, beyond those reflecting political expediencies, from Merchants of the bourgeoisie for the marriage of homosexuals and on the issues that They are openly opened, which are not few. As sides of The superstructure is related to the law of power and its management, That is, the control of the people. Church, for example, draws its power by the responsibilities given to her in control of their daily lives people. Particularly in our country there is a great influence on the political system. The Triptych "Patrice-Religion-Family" has given the ideological for many decades A stigma of the dominant policy.

Our urban 'us' class monitors, imitates and handles the policies followed by US and EU imperialists. For decades they have paid systematic Attempted to put under their control the movements for rights Woman and LGBTKI. Their goal of a they do "Him world safe for capitalism ', As the President of the Ford that its foundation They are one of the biggest sponsors of this effort. This means 'Radicals' channeling actions to legal works within the context of discrimination » ^[1] Susan writes Watkins in her multi -page article "Which feminism?" published in Magazine "New Left R Eview » where he lists specific elements showing how and when they were reinforced by the imperialists around the world, especially from the US and the EU, specific Trends of feminism. Funded those based on theories that turn on the contrast man-woman as a dominant, fighting class Marxist analysis of society, confusing LGBTKI with female Issue through social sex theory and push them to form their action solely and one -of -the -to -one of their sexuality.

For the Claiming the democratic rights of every human being is part of collectives. Before the LOATKI Organization of the LOATKI, Brave self -criticism is required for the fact that they were not offered to them Seriously another kinematic outlet nor was he convincingly explained why class peace, that characterizes the ataxic composition, never helped anyone to acquire rights. After all, class peace is on the front front in More trade unions and we see the impasse that drives.

THE Government's initiative to establish the marriage of homosexual couples and The text of the KKE open the discussion of a series of sides of the big "Family" theme. KKE's views cannot crawl uncontrollable nor to be left in the criticism of other reformists and revisionists or various feminist streams and bourgeoisie ending in anti -communism and Degradation of Marxism. Challenge to go beyond criticism.

For the positions of the KKE

The multi -page text that the KKE released to 'The positions of the KKE for the political marriage of homosexual couples and its impact on children's rights » he's got receives many reviews. There are a few who accuse it of homophobia And racism because it disagrees with the political marriage of homosexual couples. Is a one Wrong criticism. The KKE neither despises nor hosters homosexuals, Lesbians, generally people with non -heterosexual sexual orientation. Rightly characterizes the leadership of the LGBTKI "self -proclaimed" and exercises her criticism of the sack of people with different class interests but False lumps all the collectives of LGBTKI. He's the same forgot the Class analysis when talking about marriage and family, parents and children. Its placement is purely systemic. In fact, he possessed by himself moral panic that characterizes bourgeoisie when he feels that the threatened her social standards.

The KKE mentions two reasons why he disagrees with their political marriage homosexual couples. The first and the basic, as he writes, is the further commercialization of childbirth and childbirth (adoption). It is about for excuse. It is such the size of the commercialization that already exists with the heterosexual couples, which the homosexuals, much less in number, will simply They are apparently in ready -made circuits. Many will fall victim to Aetonians, as the heterosexuals fall.

THE second reason, 'Equally basic and interconnected ', is that "The child's social right to the relationship of maternity is bypassed - paternity, as an evolving Biococal relationship. " The following excerpt is characteristic: ' The more man evolves socially, the more More consciously he must also face individual responsibility in childbirth, to realize his responsibility for the new life, which is objectively Dependent of parents and especially the mother for a significant time space. The exclusion of human - social maternity means that Maternity is removed as conquering the long development of man » . In short, he refers to classic urban conservative position how destination of It is a human being to give birth and how childbirth is an individual responsibility. Disintegrates the concepts of paternity and maternity from their class trunk when he claims how "They are registered with the kind of man."

To his attempt to justify his attitude towards homosexual couples resorted to psychology to prove that he cannot balance a Child easily if he does not have his natural parents. Does not hesitate to reverse the reality by saying that "exists The contribution of both parents to the upbringing of children as a trend » as a result of the formally common right of man and woman at work and of the Progressive changes in law! Argues that "As long as the economic motive of marriage is weakened, as long as it rests and relying on more in the free choice of cohabitation (especially for the working -class, folk forces), both in the core of marriage remains a necessity only the Institutional arrangement of common parental care » . So as the KKE, we should believe the solution to the female issue has been launched!

The family in capitalism

The homosexual couples have the right to marriage and the ability to do family. The point is not to justify marriage and family. Why the marriage does not complete the happiness of two people loved, because it is a Convention with the state on an economic basis, because vows of eternal love are infected with selfishness. Fortunately there is the divorce that can cut off the His lifelong bond, if needed. Family can exist without marriage, without Children, with adolescent children, with only one parent, with same -sex parents, with the A woman older than the man (another taboo and that!)…

THE Family is the cell of society, they say. She educates the child, It lays the foundations on which every person's personality will be built. When She is sick, all society is sick. In contrast to this dominant narrative, Marxism makes it clear that family is not the cell that lays the society but its derivative. Is part of the superstructure, affects and adapts to society, changes from season to season, evolves to course of centuries. Its evolution is determined by the economic relationships that exist at the given level of production. Always holds two features that appeared with the individual property. Its monogamy and lower position woman within the one who also have different appearances depending on the time.

THE Family is one of the two axes of the woman's double oppression. In most countries laws do not discriminate against her but the Her oppression in the family remains. Even when he works and has Economic independence is still the slave of the house. Serve him man, do all the unholy household jobs and is responsible for the Care of children.

'The family must cease to is financial unit to cease to be on the basis of female oppression ', said the Engels. Economic Unit does not It means that the motive of marriage is financial. Marriage, which is the legal recognition of the family by the state is the basic institution through whose individual property issues are regulated. Her heritage Land and means of production make marriage a necessary economic necessity. That is why it has been and is up to date "The institutional matrix of childbirth". The Children are natural heirs. Housing, child care, the Education and health of its members are some of the financial duties that The family is borne. The state itself treats the family as Economic unit, through it, regulates many issues of economic policy.

THE family differs from class to class. Material conditions shape their its terms of operation. The bourgeois woman though in a lower position than the man bourgeois is not burdened with oppression at work, as opposed to her wife working class and petty bourgeoisie. The wealth and power of bourgeois, the poverty of workers and the unfulfilled "dreams" of petty bourgeois in the relationships between members of a family.

Each family reproduces the dominant ideology with which it is educated and educate its members. Not only the urban but also a family of working class, is a producer of the dominant ideology that is embedded in From how it operates, from reproduction of oppressive patterns. The bourgeois want the popular family to produce their future servants, for they use whatever mechanism they have to control the education of the Children. The media and social media have a special weight nowadays Networking showing to strike parents, priests and teachers who are moaning that their role is being discredited. School, family and Church remain the most sturdy reproduction institutions of the dominant Ideology.

Each form of family Either we identify it on the basis of the class in which belong to its members (hardworking, urban, etc.) either in the form of the form (nuclear, single parent, expanded etc) either based on gender (homosexual or heterosexual) closes in it all the contradictions that are widely developed in society and state .

Parents and children

Three Characteristics of class society, the inequality, the property and the power, penetrate as ideas on all aspects of social activity, in all human relationships and are deeply rooted in the family. Love Among its members does not negate the fact that their relationships are unequal and oppressive. "I love you" hides "you belong to me". The man He owns the woman and the parents of children's owners.

The children are considered awkward creatures to be constantly under surveillance. The good and their evil are known by others and first of all of all their parents. The newborn's physical weakness and the child's need for Care by adults, it creates a distorted image of childhood. 'Children do not belong to their parents Not even in the state but to themselves » , said Kroupskaya. In Capitalism This position is inconceivable. For the child who is not recognized No autonomy, there are either parents or institution. This situation looks completely natural. The experience of socialist construction in the Soviet Union, Particularly the conclusions from the cultural revolution raised the issue of Child on a new basis. The socialization of domestic work allowed the children not systematically depend on their mother for their daily problems. Without stopping parents dealing with their children, the Socialist society supported children as a whole. In simple words, the answers on a number of issues related to education, upbringing, Curator and adoption in the context of capitalism contain all errors of the social system.

Today, Those who shudder with the marriage of homosexual couples invoke the Child Rights. They cannot and do not want to see beyond capitalist system. The KKE in its attempt not to identify with the urban reactive standards and the darkness of the church claims that Progressive changes in the law and work of the woman have balanced the roles of mother and father in raising children. This is not apply. Mother is burdened with daily care of children, deals with almost exclusively with their progress at school and with education their. When the woman has children radically changes her life and enters into New base its relationship with work. When the man becomes a father not similar upheavals are observed. Family in capitalism oppresses the A woman who in turn oppresses children and oppresses them. THE release of a woman by the child, leads to overthrow her role maternity and paternity and ends up in the liberation of his own Child. Woman cannot earn equality with men, if not at the same time raise the issue of overthrowing the oppressive relationship of parents to children.

THE Socialist society is the environment where the family will be removed with Form we know and will be on a new basis for human relationships. The The superstructure has proven very hard. It will take many cultural revolutions.

Reproduction

'The recognition of common parental liability homosexual couples can only occur by bypassing objective complementarity Woman - Man in Playing of the species, in childbirth » , writes the KKE. This position is supplemented with a concern that 'Opening issues for the possibility of reproduction of man fully with technology within laboratory conditions as well as issues intervention and genetic code, predetermination of characteristics, etc., that is, With elements of eugenics » . It is true that the bourgeois are capable of doing Everything to have what they want, could even order even Child with specific specifications. The president of SYRIZA, Kasselakis, said How he would like to get two children boys. KKE phobias for bypass of human physical reproduction from biology laboratories, show the His distance from reality and dialectical historical materialism. Before They clone us, most likely to disappear us. Costs less, It is implemented in Palestine and have nuclear.

From On the other hand, Marxist feminism claims that 'The production of people and the special care for the development and the Their prosperity, they act as a prerequisite for capitalism ... Women's strike activism ... It also interrupts domestic work, the sex and smiles » [2] . The approach is completely mechanistic and arbitrary. The reproduction of man cannot be treated as a job.

'The immediate, physical, necessary human relationship to man is a man's relationship to the woman ... in this relationship manifests in a felt form, diminishes to a fact that can be done Object of observation, the extent to which the human substance has become Nature for man or nature has become human substance. Consequently, by the relationship This can one judge the whole level of human development » [3] ; Marx writes. Through this dialectical unity of the physicist and The Communists see the reproduction. The birth and upbringing of Children is the result of a human relationship. Lenin called him Malthusianism claiming that births should be limited because the Land cannot nourish a large population of people who in the end ends up in Children are considered an obstacle to the happiness of a couple. There is and The opposite view that without children there is no happiness. Both approaches They are reactive. One considers children trouble and the other supplement of their parents.

In Greece they talk about infertility to seek ban on abortions and for infertility to stigmatize the Women who no longer give birth to a young age. Made the child tax presumption, give crumbs or nothing to couples who choose the IVF fertilization And the process of adoption is still multi -faceted. They were carved the institution of the surrogate mother either concerned with heterosexuals or homosexuals pairs means extreme exploitation of the female body with purely class characteristics. Surrogate mother will become the poor woman to serve the vanity of rich couples. The asterisks, the exceptions, the special cases and questions that come in in cases of Adoption and IVF, the system puts its seal. The issues ethics cannot be answered in the terms of a system that is hostile to man.

The Emotional relationships between people and especially between the two sexes, like love among people of the same sex have been there since that there are people. THE 'State regulation of sexual love » , as Engels calls the marriage, he will not take out No one oppressed by obscurity.

"For the time being humanity is the cold and moral insulation and can only dream of the best of that century that all human relationships will be watered by new conditions Life. The sexual crisis is unsolved without fundamental reform of Human psychology, without increasing erotic potential. This mental Reformation is completely dependent on the basic reorganization of the Our socio-economic relations on communist bases. In addition to her There is no other way out the old truth » [4] .

THE Ideological confrontation opened on the marriage of homosexual couples, can not stop. Is side of the class struggle . The revolution that will overthrow class barbarism will liberate huge powers. The more we prepare her the more they will come In front of us are its solutions.